People v. Perez

167 N.Y.S.3d 409, 2022 NY Slip Op 03533
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 183 A.D.3d 934
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 1, 2022·No. Ind. No. 2514/18·Published

Opinion

People v Perez (2022 NY Slip Op 03533)
People v Perez
2022 NY Slip Op 03533
Decided on June 1, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 1, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J.
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
LARA J. GENOVESI
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

2019-12903
(Ind. No. 2514/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Rene Perez, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Rhea A. Grob, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barry E. Warhit, J.), rendered October 16, 2019, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, attempted assault in the second degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to indeterminate terms of imprisonment of three to six years on the conviction of robbery in the third degree, two to four years on the conviction of attempted assault in the second degree, and two to four years on the conviction of grand larceny in the fourth degree, with the sentences to run consecutively to each other.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by providing that the term of imprisonment imposed on the conviction of grand larceny in the fourth degree shall run concurrently with the term of imprisonment imposed on the conviction of robbery in the third degree; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, the sentence imposed on the defendant's conviction of grand larceny in the fourth degree must be modified to run concurrently with the sentence imposed on the conviction of robbery in the third degree (see Penal Law § 70.25[2]; People v Dean, 8 NY3d 929; People v Parks, 95 NY2d 811, 814-815; People v Powell, 187 AD3d 611; People v Robinson, 178 AD3d 861; People v Smith, 244 AD2d 583).

LASALLE, P.J., CONNOLLY, GENOVESI and FORD, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 167 N.Y.S.3d 409, 2022 NY Slip Op 03533 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

167 N.Y.S.3d 409 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dean
866 N.E.2d 1032 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Parks
734 N.E.2d 741 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Smith
244 A.D.2d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)