People v. Perdue

48 Cal. 552, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 195
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1874·No. No. 10,105·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Wallace, C. J.:

The prisoner, adjudged guilty of the crime of manslaughter, and sentenced to suffer imprisonment in the State Prison for the period of two years, has prosecuted an ap-. peal, and now moves that he be admitted to bail pending the appeal. The statute (Penal Code, Sec. 1,272) provides [553] that in such a case as this the prisoner may be admitted to bail “as a matter of discretion.” The views I entertain upon the general question were expressed in Ex parte Hoge, ante p. 3. In that case the Judge of the Court in which the prisoner had been convicted had considered his application, and had refused to admit him to bail. It is understood that in the present case the Judge of the Court below has refused to consider the application of the prisoner because the appeal taken had brought the case to this Court. That circumstance, in point of law, afforded no reason why the application should not be entertained by the District Judge. The facts and circumstances going to make up the legal discretion in the sound exercise of which the prisoner may be admitted to bail, are necessarily within the knowledge of the Judge who presided at the trial, and, in practice, the power to admit to bail pending the appeal, ought not to be exercised by us in the first instance, or until after the determination of the application below upon its merits.

The motion made here must, therefore, be denied, with leave to the prisoner to renew the application to the Judge of the Court below.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perdue, 48 Cal. 552, 1874 Cal. LEXIS 195 (Cal. 1874).

48 Cal. 552 (People v. Perdue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Podesto
544 P.2d 1297 (California Supreme Court, 1976)
People v. Norman
252 Cal. App. 2d 381 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
In Re Brumback
299 P.2d 217 (California Supreme Court, 1956)
In re Malotte
285 P.2d 114 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
Polito v. State
275 P.2d 884 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1954)
People v. Hall
251 P.2d 979 (California Court of Appeal, 1952)
In Re Wilkins
226 P. 964 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
Matter of the Application of Preciado
158 P. 1063 (California Court of Appeal, 1916)
People v. Barríos
23 P.R. 195 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1915)
People v. Cornell
153 P. 726 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
Pueblo v. Barrios
22 P.R. Dec. 857 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1915)
Ex parte Atkinson
58 So. 215 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1911)
State v. Smith
33 Nev. 435 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1910)
Ex parte Turner
45 P. 571 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
People v. January
11 P. 326 (California Supreme Court, 1886)