People v. Perdomo

305 A.D.2d 303, 759 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5912
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perdomo. Read the opinion of the Court — 280 A.D.2d 617

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Peter Benitez, J., at plea; Barbara Newman, J., at sentence), rendered September 18, 2000, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of five years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s argument that his plea was not knowing and voluntary in that the court gave him insufficient information as to postrelease supervision is unpreserved (see People v Curry, 301 AD2d 658 [2003]; People v White, 296 AD2d 867 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 540 [2002]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the plea allocution adequately covered this subject. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Tom, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perdomo, 305 A.D.2d 303, 759 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

305 A.D.2d 303 (People v. Perdomo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. White
296 A.D.2d 867 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Curry
301 A.D.2d 658 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)