People v. Peralta

California Supreme Court

People v. Peralta

3 Cal. 379

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1853

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 3 Cal. 379 (People v. Peralta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Peralta, 3 Cal. 379 (Cal. 1853).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Murray, Chief Justice,

Heydenfeldt, Justice, concurring.

The defendant was convicted of an assault and battery in the Court of Sessions. He appealed to the District Court, where the judgment was affirmed.

We have decided at this term, in Caulfield y. Hudson, that the District Court has no appellate power. It was therefore error to take jurisdiction.

The judgment of affirmance in the District Court is reversed, and the appeal from the Court of Sessions to the District Court is dismissed.

Let the costs abide the final result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Murray, Chief Justice,

Heydenfeldt, Justice, concurring.

The defendant was convicted of an assault and battery in the Court of Sessions. He appealed to the District Court, where the judgment was affirmed.

We have decided at this term, in Caulfield y. Hudson, that the District Court has no appellate power. It was therefore error to take jurisdiction.

The judgment of affirmance in the District Court is reversed, and the appeal from the Court of Sessions to the District Court is dismissed.

Let the costs abide the final result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cal. 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-peralta-cal-1853.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack