People v. Perad

100 A.D.3d 805, 953 N.Y.S.2d 861

This text of 100 A.D.3d 805 (People v. Perad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Perad, 100 A.D.3d 805, 953 N.Y.S.2d 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered July 28, 2008, convicting her of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial (Roman, J), after a hearing (O’Dwyer, J.H.O.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence recovered from the defendant’s apartment is granted, and a new trial is ordered.

For the reasons stated in People v Harper (100 AD3d 772 [2012] [decided herewith]), the subject branch of the defendant’s motion should have been granted. Angiolillo, J.P, Florio, Leventhal and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Harper
100 A.D.3d 772 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.3d 805, 953 N.Y.S.2d 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-perad-nyappdiv-2012.