People v. Pepe

262 A.D.2d 7, 690 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6149
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 1, 1999·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Silverman, J.), rendered May 14, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in precluding defendant from commenting on the People’s failure to call a witness and in instructing the jury not to speculate as to what [8]*8testimony the witness might have given, since defendant did not establish any foundation for such a summation comment (see, People v Tankleff, 84 NY2d 992, 995).

The record establishes a valid waiver of defendant’s right to attend bench conferences during voir dire. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pepe, 262 A.D.2d 7, 690 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

262 A.D.2d 7 (People v. Pepe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nails
95 A.D.3d 1237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
THOMAS, CHESTER J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People v. Thomas
85 A.D.3d 1572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)