People v. Pepe

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Pepe

226 N.E.2d 179, 19 N.Y.2d 748, 279 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1682

DecidedMarch 2, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 226 N.E.2d 179 (People v. Pepe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pepe, 226 N.E.2d 179, 19 N.Y.2d 748, 279 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1682 (N.Y. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant Pepe to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant Pepe contended that his rights under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States were violated in connection with certain statements given by him to the authorities. The Court of Appeals held that appellant Pepe’s constitutional rights were not violated. [See 18 N Y 2d 955.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant Pepe to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Defendant Pepe contended that his rights under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States were violated in connection with certain statements given by him to the authorities. The Court of Appeals held that appellant Pepe’s constitutional rights were not violated. [See 18 N Y 2d 955.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 N.E.2d 179, 19 N.Y.2d 748, 279 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pepe-ny-1967.