People v. Pendelton

134 A.D.3d 737, 19 N.Y.S.3d 782
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Pendelton. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 A.D.3d 774
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 2015·No. 2013-10157·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), rendered October 18, 2013, convicting him of failure to register or verify as a sex offender, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered because the County Court failed to sufficiently explain to him all of the constitutional rights that he was waiving upon his plea is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea or otherwise raise this issue before the court (see CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Pollidore, 123 AD3d 1058 [2014]; People v Holcombe, 116 AD3d 1063 [2014]; People v Franco, 104 AD3d 790 [2013]). In any event, the defendant’s contention is belied by the record, including the court’s plea allocution, and the defendant’s acknowledgment that he discussed taking the plea with his attorney (see People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]). Leventhal, J.P., Roman, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pendelton, 134 A.D.3d 737, 19 N.Y.S.3d 782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

134 A.D.3d 737 (People v. Pendelton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pollidore
123 A.D.3d 1058 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Tyrell
4 N.E.3d 346 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
People v. Franco
104 A.D.3d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Holcombe
116 A.D.3d 1063 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)