People v. Pena

2025 NY Slip Op 03023
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 20, 2025
DocketInd. No. 70919/21; Appeal No. 4398; Case No. 2024-00626
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 03023 (People v. Pena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pena, 2025 NY Slip Op 03023 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Pena (2025 NY Slip Op 03023)
People v Pena
2025 NY Slip Op 03023
Decided on May 20, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 20, 2025
Before: Webber, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Rosado, Michael, JJ.

Ind. No. 70919/21|Appeal No. 4398|Case No. 2024-00626|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Luis Pena, Defendant-Appellant.


Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Benjamin Wiener of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Rafael Curbelo of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Guy H. Mitchell, J.), rendered January 5, 2024, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of petit larceny, and sentencing him to two years of probation, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly imposed, as a condition of probation, a requirement that defendant consent to warrantless searches of his person, home, and car (see People v Scott, 226 AD3d 443, 443 [1st Dept 2024], lv denied 42 NY3d 930 [2024]). The condition was reasonably related to his rehabilitation, given defendant's conduct in the instant offense in which he was armed with a glass bottle which he used as a weapon, his youthful offender adjudication for fourth-degree weapon possession, the use of a firearm during the crime by an unapprehended accomplice, as well as the photograph recovered from his iCloud account which depicted firearms displayed on his bed (id.; see Penal Law § 65.10[1]).

Although we find that defendant did not make a valid waiver of his right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 20, 2025



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431
§ 65.10
New York PEN § 65.10

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 03023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pena-nyappdiv-2025.