People v. Pena

2017 NY Slip Op 5977, 153 A.D.3d 556, 56 N.Y.S.3d 884
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 2, 2017
Docket2016-05268
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 5977 (People v. Pena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pena, 2017 NY Slip Op 5977, 153 A.D.3d 556, 56 N.Y.S.3d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Efman, J.), imposed October 6, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Guarchaj, 122 AD3d 878, 879 [2014]; People v Pelaez, 100 AD3d 803 [2012]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v McKinney, 141 AD3d 1031, 1032 [2016]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Chambers, J.P., Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Guarchaj
122 A.D.3d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. McKinney
141 A.D.3d 1031 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Pelaez
100 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 5977, 153 A.D.3d 556, 56 N.Y.S.3d 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pena-nyappdiv-2017.