People v. Pena

2017 NY Slip Op 5977, 153 A.D.3d 556, 56 N.Y.S.3d 884
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 2, 2017·No. 2016-05268·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Efman, J.), imposed October 6, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Guarchaj, 122 AD3d 878, 879 [2014]; People v Pelaez, 100 AD3d 803 [2012]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v McKinney, 141 AD3d 1031, 1032 [2016]; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Chambers, J.P., Miller, Hinds-Radix and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pena, 2017 NY Slip Op 5977, 153 A.D.3d 556, 56 N.Y.S.3d 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 5977 (People v. Pena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Guarchaj
122 A.D.3d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. McKinney
141 A.D.3d 1031 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Pelaez
100 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)