People v. Pena

279 A.D.2d 639, 719 N.Y.S.2d 877, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 933
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 29, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), rendered November 24, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to [640]*640withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, Acting P. J., S. Miller, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pena, 279 A.D.2d 639, 719 N.Y.S.2d 877, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

279 A.D.2d 639 (People v. Pena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pena
2 A.D.3d 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)