People v. Pena

243 A.D.2d 425, 663 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10836
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), rendered December 22, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s redacted arrest photograph was properly admitted into evidence, because it was relevant, under the circumstances presented, identification being the principal contested issue in the case, notwithstanding defendant’s claim that his appearance at the time of his arrest was unchallenged (see, People v Maldonado, 228 AD2d 170, lv denied 88 NY2d 967; see also, People v Heine, 238 AD2d 212). In any event, admission of the photograph did not result in any prejudice to defendant. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Williams and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pena, 243 A.D.2d 425, 663 N.Y.S.2d 212, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 425 (People v. Pena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Abdul
247 A.D.2d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)