Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Peller, Podinker

People v. Peller, Podinker

50 N.E.2d 300, 290 N.Y. 905, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1477
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 18, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 N.E.2d 300 (People v. Peller, Podinker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Peller, Podinker, 50 N.E.2d 300, 290 N.Y. 905, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1477 (N.Y. 1943).

Opinions

Judgments of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.

LOUGHRAN, J., concurs in the following memorandum: An accomplice-witness can be sufficiently corroborated solely by a testimonial report of an extra-judicial oral admission of the accused, though such report is made only by a thoroughly discredited witness. (People v. Buchalter, 289 N.Y. 181.) *Page 907

RIPPEY, J., concurs as to Podinker, but dissents and votes to reverse as to Peller on the ground that the evidence is insufficient as matter of law to sustain a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Peller and Podinker
50 N.E.2d 1021 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 N.E.2d 300, 290 N.Y. 905, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-peller-podinker-ny-1943.