People v. Peller, Podinker

50 N.E.2d 300, 290 N.Y. 905, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1477
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 1943·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Judgments of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.

LOUGHRAN, J., concurs in the following memorandum: An accomplice-witness can be sufficiently corroborated solely by a testimonial report of an extra-judicial oral admission of the accused, though such report is made only by a thoroughly discredited witness. (People v. Buchalter, 289 N.Y. 181.) *Page 907

RIPPEY, J., concurs as to Podinker, but dissents and votes to reverse as to Peller on the ground that the evidence is insufficient as matter of law to sustain a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Peller, Podinker, 50 N.E.2d 300, 290 N.Y. 905, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1477 (N.Y. 1943).

50 N.E.2d 300 (People v. Peller, Podinker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Peller and Podinker
50 N.E.2d 1021 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)