People v. Pelczynski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pelczynski

19 A.D.3d 1181, 796 N.Y.S.2d 262, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6402

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Pelczynski. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 A.D.3d 1279 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 10, 2005·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the order entered March 18, 2005 [16 AD3d 1181] is amended by deleting the second sentence of the first paragraph and substituting the following sentence: “The judgment imposed a sentence of impris[1182]*1182onment following the finding that defendant had failed to pay restitution as previously ordered.” Present—Kehoe, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the order entered March 18, 2005 [16 AD3d 1181] is amended by deleting the second sentence of the first paragraph and substituting the following sentence: “The judgment imposed a sentence of impris[1182]*1182onment following the finding that defendant had failed to pay restitution as previously ordered.” Present—Kehoe, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.

People v. Pelczynski, 19 A.D.3d 1181, 796 N.Y.S.2d 262, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

19 A.D.3d 1181 (People v. Pelczynski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.