People v. Pek

2019 NY Slip Op 362
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 17, 2019
Docket8135 2345/15
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 362 (People v. Pek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pek, 2019 NY Slip Op 362 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Pek (2019 NY Slip Op 00362)
People v Pek
2019 NY Slip Op 00362
Decided on January 17, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 17, 2019
Renwick, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, Mazzarelli, Kahn, JJ.

8135 2345/15

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Eric Pek, Defendant-Appellant.


Justine M. Luongo, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Eve Kessler of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jonathon Krois of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Maxwell Wiley, J.), rendered April 20, 2016, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree (two counts), burglary in the first degree, burglary in the second degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 14 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied youthful offender treatment. Because defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree, youthful offender treatment would require a showing of mitigating circumstances (CPL 720.10[2][a][iii];[3]), and the record supports the court's finding that such circumstances did not exist in this case. Defendant's participation in this extremely

violent crime was very significant. In any event, regardless of eligibility, youthful offender treatment was not warranted.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 17, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pek-nyappdiv-2019.