People v. Peguero

2025 NY Slip Op 02134
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 10, 2025
DocketInd No. 1036/16; Appeal No. 4090; Case No. 2018-2237
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 02134 (People v. Peguero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Peguero, 2025 NY Slip Op 02134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Peguero (2025 NY Slip Op 02134)
People v Peguero
2025 NY Slip Op 02134
Decided on April 10, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 10, 2025
Before: Kern, J.P., Kennedy, Gesmer, Pitt-Burke, O'Neill Levy, JJ.

Ind No. 1036/16|Appeal No. 4090|Case No. 2018-2237|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Adiel Peguero, Defendant-Appellant.


Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sarah Lubin of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen N. Biben, J.), rendered June 30, 2017, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3½ years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid. Among other things, the court failed to confirm on the record that defendant understood the rights he was waiving (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]). However, based on our review of the record, and "our in camera review [of the sealed or redacted portions of] the search warrant application, the police officer's supporting affidavit, and the testimony of both the officer and the confidential informant before the. . .court" (see People v Holmes, 235 AD3d 435 [1st Dept 2025]), "we find no basis to controvert the search warrant at issue or to grant any other relief" (People v Jenkins, 200 AD3d 541, 541 [1st Dept 2021], lv denied 38 NY3d 1071 [2022]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 10, 2025



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 02134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-peguero-nyappdiv-2025.