People v. Peele

188 N.E.2d 265, 12 N.Y.2d 890
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 23, 1963·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since juvenile delinquency adjudications are not convictions of crime either in New York or Virginia (see former N. Y. City Dom. Eel. Ct. Act, § 84 and former Children’s Ct. Act, § 45, subd. 4; Family Ct. Act, § 781; Code of Virginia, § 16.1-179), it was erroneous and improper at this trial to use such an adjudication, made in Virginia, as a “ criminal conviction” to impeach the testimony of defendant. The error in this case was, however, not reversible since the prosecutor in good faith believed that there had been a criminal conviction, and the references thereto at the trial could not on this record have prejudiced defendant’s substantial rights.

[892]*892Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed pursuant to section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Peele, 188 N.E.2d 265, 12 N.Y.2d 890 (N.Y. 1963).

188 N.E.2d 265 (People v. Peele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gray
646 N.E.2d 444 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
In the Interest of I. S. H.
344 So. 2d 1295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Louis Samuel Cotton v. United States
355 F.2d 480 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)