People v. Peek

604 P.2d 23, 199 Colo. 3, 1979 Colo. LEXIS 805
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided December 10, 1979·No. 79SA223·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

This is an appeal by the district attorney on a question of law, section 16-12-102, C.R.S. 1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8). The defendants were not brought to trial within the six months that followed their arraignment, and an interpretation of the speedy trial provisions, section 18-1-405(1), C.R.S. 1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8) and Crim. P. 48 is the sole issue *4 before us.

It is the burden of the prosecution and the trial court to comply with the requirements of both the speedy trial statute and rule. People v. Colantonio, 196 Colo. 242, 583 P.2d 919 (1978); People v. Lopez, 41 Colo. App. 206, 587 P.2d 792 (1978). The defendants did not waive their right to a speedy trial and their motion to dismiss was properly granted. Harrington v. District Court, 192 Colo. 351, 559 P.2d 225 (1977); Tasset v. Yeager, 195 Colo. 190, 576 P.2d 558 (1978).

Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Peek, 604 P.2d 23, 199 Colo. 3, 1979 Colo. LEXIS 805 (Colo. 1979).

604 P.2d 23 (People v. Peek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Deason
670 P.2d 792 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1983)
People v. Bell
669 P.2d 1381 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1983)
People v. Moye
635 P.2d 194 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1981)