People v. Pedroza

269 A.D.2d 283, 704 N.Y.S.2d 455, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2017

This text of 269 A.D.2d 283 (People v. Pedroza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pedroza, 269 A.D.2d 283, 704 N.Y.S.2d 455, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Obús, J.), rendered May 16, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Read as a whole (see, People v Canty, 60 NY2d 830), the [284]*284court’s response to an inquiry from the deliberating jury with regard to sentencing properly reminded the jury not to consider punishment and could not have caused any prejudice to defendant (compare, People v Santini, 221 App Div 139, 142, affd 246 NY2d 612). Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Saxe, Buckley and Friedman. JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Santini
221 A.D. 139 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
People v. Canty
457 N.E.2d 800 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 283, 704 N.Y.S.2d 455, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pedroza-nyappdiv-2000.