People v. Pedraja
49 A.D.3d 325, 852 N.Y.2d 761
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 2008·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Defendant concedes that he qualifies as a level two sex offender, based on 80 uncontested points in the risk assessment instrument. The court properly declined to rule on the 10 contested points, since no such ruling was necessary to its determination (cf. People v Graham, 35 AD3d 299 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 808 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Buckley, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Pedraja, 49 A.D.3d 325, 852 N.Y.2d 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 325 (People v. Pedraja) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Simmons
128 A.D.3d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Evans
127 A.D.3d 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Rodriguez
123 A.D.3d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Lucas
118 A.D.3d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)