Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Pedraja

People v. Pedraja

49 A.D.3d 325, 852 N.Y.2d 761
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 11, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 49 A.D.3d 325 (People v. Pedraja) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pedraja, 49 A.D.3d 325, 852 N.Y.2d 761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Defendant concedes that he qualifies as a level two sex offender, based on 80 uncontested points in the risk assessment instrument. The court properly declined to rule on the 10 contested points, since no such ruling was necessary to its determination (cf. People v Graham, 35 AD3d 299 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 808 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Buckley, Sweeny and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Simmons
128 A.D.3d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Evans
127 A.D.3d 673 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Rodriguez
123 A.D.3d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Lucas
118 A.D.3d 415 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 325, 852 N.Y.2d 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pedraja-nyappdiv-2008.