People v. Pedlar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pedlar

98 A.D.2d 732, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21040

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 5, 1983·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agresta, J.), rendered May 5, 1982, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s motion to be relieved as counsel is granted (see [733]*733Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Agresta, J.), rendered May 5, 1982, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s motion to be relieved as counsel is granted (see [733]*733Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

People v. Pedlar, 98 A.D.2d 732, 468 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

98 A.D.2d 732 (People v. Pedlar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related