People v. Peck

502 N.E.2d 991, 68 N.Y.2d 928, 510 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20880
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 11, 1986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant contends that his statement made to police officers at the scene of a robbery should have been excluded from evidence because the People failed to provide him with timely notice or demonstrate good cause for such failure (CPL 710.30). To the extent that defendant’s present contention was preserved for our review, it was waived (CPL 710.30 [3]). Defendant’s additional argument that his trial attorney was so inadequate as to deny him effective assistance of counsel is without merit.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Peck, 502 N.E.2d 991, 68 N.Y.2d 928, 510 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20880 (N.Y. 1986).

502 N.E.2d 991 (People v. Peck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. St. Martine
160 A.D.2d 35 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)