People v. Peck

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Peck

502 N.E.2d 991, 68 N.Y.2d 928, 510 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20880

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 11, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 502 N.E.2d 991 (People v. Peck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Peck, 502 N.E.2d 991, 68 N.Y.2d 928, 510 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20880 (N.Y. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant contends that his statement made to police officers at the scene of a robbery should have been excluded from evidence because the People failed to provide him with timely notice or demonstrate good cause for such failure (CPL 710.30). To the extent that defendant’s present contention was preserved for our review, it was waived (CPL 710.30 [3]). Defendant’s additional argument that his trial attorney was so inadequate as to deny him effective assistance of counsel is without merit.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI