People v. . Pease Elliman, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

People v. . Pease Elliman, Inc.

114 N.E. 1086, 219 N.Y. 627, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 971

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 5, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 114 N.E. 1086 (People v. . Pease Elliman, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. . Pease Elliman, Inc., 114 N.E. 1086, 219 N.Y. 627, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 971 (N.Y. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

*628 Per Curiam.

We think the defendant’s objection to the information must fail. The other questions argued in the briefs and at our bar we are without jurisdiction to determine. They are not presented by any exception, for there was no motion at the close of the case for the acquittal of the defendant (People v. Bresler, 218 N. Y. 567). We are, therefore, without power to determine upon this record whether section 79-b of the Labor Law has been properly construed.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Hiscook, Ohase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI