People v. . Pease Elliman, Inc.

114 N.E. 1086, 219 N.Y. 627, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 971
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 5, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*628 Per Curiam.

We think the defendant’s objection to the information must fail. The other questions argued in the briefs and at our bar we are without jurisdiction to determine. They are not presented by any exception, for there was no motion at the close of the case for the acquittal of the defendant (People v. Bresler, 218 N. Y. 567). We are, therefore, without power to determine upon this record whether section 79-b of the Labor Law has been properly construed.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Hiscook, Ohase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. . Pease Elliman, Inc., 114 N.E. 1086, 219 N.Y. 627, 1916 N.Y. LEXIS 971 (N.Y. 1916).

114 N.E. 1086 (People v. . Pease Elliman, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Robertson
281 A.D. 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)