People v. Pearson
This text of 281 A.D.2d 494 (People v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.), rendered May 22, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was not improperly denied Brady material (see, Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83; People v Vilardi, 76 NY2d 67; People v Rushin, 172 AD2d 571). Moreover, the Supreme Court properly allowed rebuttal testimony (see, People v Harris, 57 NY2d 335).
The defendant’s sentence was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, Acting P. J., Ritter, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D.2d 494, 721 N.Y.S.2d 779, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pearson-nyappdiv-2001.