People v. Pearson
This text of 34 A.D.2d 849 (People v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur granted and remittitur amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily pássed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that the evidence at the hearing conclusively established that his plea of guilty was involuntary 'and, therefore, his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States were violated. The Appellate Division held that appellant’s constitutional rights were not violated. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur. [33 A D 2d 895.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 A.D.2d 849, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pearson-nyappdiv-1970.