People v. Peacock
6 Cow. 72
Opinion
said they had considered the case, and were satisfied that the indictment for a forgery was sustainable; and they, accordingly, advised the oyer and terminer to pass sentence upon the prisoner.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Peacock, 6 Cow. 72 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1826).
6 Cow. 72 (People v. Peacock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nelson v. State
167 A.2d 871 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1961)
International Union Bank v. National Surety Co.
157 N.E. 269 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
International Union Bank v. National Surety Co.
124 Misc. 842 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1925)
People's Trust Co. v. . Smith
109 N.E. 561 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Bunker v. State
177 S.W. 108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)
People v. Biddison
24 N.Y. Crim. 343 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
People v. Rushing
62 P. 742 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
Mann v. People
22 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 155 (New York Supreme Court, 1878)