People v. Peacock
This text of 126 A.D.3d 919 (People v. Peacock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Iliou, J.), rendered April 17, 2013, convicting her of vehicular manslaughter in the first degree and driving while ability impaired by drugs, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited any claim that the rebuttable presumption contained in Penal Law §§ 125.12 and 125.13 unconstitutionally shifts the burden of proof (see People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1, 5 [1985]; People v Thomas, 53 NY2d 338, 344 [1981]). The defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal forecloses review of her contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Trahan, 124 AD3d 699 [2015]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 A.D.3d 919, 2 N.Y.S.3d 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-peacock-nyappdiv-2015.