People v. Peacock

70 A.D.2d 781, 417 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12287
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 22, 1979·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: During the trial two .prosecution witnesses were permitted, over objection, to testify concerning an out-of-court statement made by the complainant in which she identified the defendant as the man who had raped her. Absent a claim of recent fabrication such testimony improperly bolsters the complainant’s credibility and is inadmissible (People v Wooden, 66 AD2d 1004). However, in light of the strong evidence of guilt, including defendant’s confession, we find the error to be harmless (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court — rape, first degree.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan, and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Peacock, 70 A.D.2d 781, 417 N.Y.S.2d 339, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

70 A.D.2d 781 (People v. Peacock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fagan
104 A.D.2d 252 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)