People v. Paz

126 A.D.3d 1011, 3 N.Y.S.3d 615, 2015 NY Slip Op 02504, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2520
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 2015
Docket2013-01699
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 126 A.D.3d 1011 (People v. Paz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Paz, 126 A.D.3d 1011, 3 N.Y.S.3d 615, 2015 NY Slip Op 02504, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zayas, J.), imposed December 13, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid *1012 and, therefore, does not preclude appellate review of his excessive sentence claim (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Skelos, Leventhal, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mendoza
2019 NY Slip Op 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Diasia F.
2018 NY Slip Op 5938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 A.D.3d 1011, 3 N.Y.S.3d 615, 2015 NY Slip Op 02504, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-paz-nyappdiv-2015.