People v. Paz

126 A.D.3d 1011, 3 N.Y.S.3d 615, 2015 NY Slip Op 02504, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2520
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 2015·No. 2013-01699·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zayas, J.), imposed December 13, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid *1012 and, therefore, does not preclude appellate review of his excessive sentence claim (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Skelos, Leventhal, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Paz, 126 A.D.3d 1011, 3 N.Y.S.3d 615, 2015 NY Slip Op 02504, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

126 A.D.3d 1011 (People v. Paz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mendoza
2019 NY Slip Op 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Diasia F.
2018 NY Slip Op 5938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)