People v. Payne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Payne

181 A.D. 899

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Assuming that the plaintiff acquired no title under the tax deeds, it unquestionably under the Waldo partition action acquired title to an undivided interest in the property, and could by proper amendment if necessary make all the alleged tenants in common parties to this action, and maintain ejectment against the defendants who have failed to connect themselves in any manner with the title. It is clear that the defendants in no aspect of the ease can succeed. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Assuming that the plaintiff acquired no title under the tax deeds, it unquestionably under the Waldo partition action acquired title to an undivided interest in the property, and could by proper amendment if necessary make all the alleged tenants in common parties to this action, and maintain ejectment against the defendants who have failed to connect themselves in any manner with the title. It is clear that the defendants in no aspect of the ease can succeed. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

People v. Payne, 181 A.D. 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

181 A.D. 899 (People v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related