People v. Payen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Payen

120 A.D.3d 1123, 992 N.Y.S.2d 416

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 23, 2014

Docket12999 3743/10

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.3d 1123 (People v. Payen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Payen, 120 A.D.3d 1123, 992 N.Y.S.2d 416 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered July 18, 2011, as amended August 2, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of scheme to defraud in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), forgery in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (three counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 5 to 10 years, with restitution in the amount of $17,179.05, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence amply demonstrated that defendant obtained money in exchange for fraudulent immigration services, and that he forged documents.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Renwick, Andrias, Richter and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Farber, J.), rendered July 18, 2011, as amended August 2, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of scheme to defraud in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), forgery in the second degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (three counts), and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 5 to 10 years, with restitution in the amount of $17,179.05, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence amply demonstrated that defendant obtained money in exchange for fraudulent immigration services, and that he forged documents.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Renwick, Andrias, Richter and Feinman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.3d 1123, 992 N.Y.S.2d 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-payen-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack