People v. Payamps

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Payamps

154 A.D.2d 627, 546 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13507

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 154 A.D.2d 627 (People v. Payamps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Payamps, 154 A.D.2d 627, 546 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.), rendered August 16, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the constitutional validity of his sentence is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Mateo, 144 AD2d 388; People v McDermott, 142 AD2d 652) and, in any event, is devoid1 of merit (see, People v Jones, 39 NY2d 694). Moreover, the defendant was sentenced pursuant to a negotiated plea and should not now be heard to complain that the term imposed was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Santagata, J.), rendered August 16, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the constitutional validity of his sentence is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Mateo, 144 AD2d 388; People v McDermott, 142 AD2d 652) and, in any event, is devoid1 of merit (see, People v Jones, 39 NY2d 694). Moreover, the defendant was sentenced pursuant to a negotiated plea and should not now be heard to complain that the term imposed was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 A.D.2d 627, 546 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-payamps-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack