People v. Pavlisak, Jones

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Pavlisak, Jones

53 N.E.2d 845, 292 N.Y. 504, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1667

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 53 N.E.2d 845 (People v. Pavlisak, Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pavlisak, Jones, 53 N.E.2d 845, 292 N.Y. 504, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1667 (N.Y. 1944).

Pincite

Opinions

The judgments should be affirmed on the ground that there was no prejudicial error in the charge as to reasonable doubt when read in its entirety or in any other rulings of the trial court to which exceptions were taken. We may not consider rulings to which no exceptions were taken. (People v. Cummins, 209 N. Y. 283; People v. Pindar, 210 N. Y. 191.)

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Lewis, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur; Conway, J., dissents in the following memorandum in which Rippey, J., concurs:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgments should be affirmed on the ground that there was no prejudicial error in the charge as to reasonable doubt when read in its entirety or in any other rulings of the trial court to which exceptions were taken. We may not consider rulings to which no exceptions were taken. (People v. Cummins, 209 N. Y. 283; People v. Pindar, 210 N. Y. 191.)

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Lewis, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur; Conway, J., dissents in the following memorandum in which Rippey, J., concurs:

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 N.E.2d 845, 292 N.Y. 504, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pavlisak-jones-ny-1944.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack