People v. Paulino

2017 NY Slip Op 7196
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Paulino. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 A.D.3d 65
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 2017·No. 4670 2797/13·Published

Opinion

People v Paulino (2017 NY Slip Op 07196)
People v Paulino
2017 NY Slip Op 07196
Decided on October 12, 2017
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 12, 2017
Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Mazzarelli, Webber, Oing, JJ.

4670 2797/13

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Harold Paulino, Defendant-Appellant.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Heidi Bota of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Oliver McDonald of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Nuñez, J.), rendered May 28, 2015,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 12, 2017

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Paulino, 2017 NY Slip Op 7196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 7196 (People v. Paulino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431