People v. Paulino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Paulino

284 A.D.2d 350, 725 N.Y.S.2d 886, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5590

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 350 (People v. Paulino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Paulino, 284 A.D.2d 350, 725 N.Y.S.2d 886, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered September 16, 1999, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the manner in which the court marshaled the evidence during its charge is not preserved for appellate review since no objection was made to the charge on that ground (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bacchus, 183 AD2d 720; People v McDonald, 144 AD2d 701). Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered September 16, 1999, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the manner in which the court marshaled the evidence during its charge is not preserved for appellate review since no objection was made to the charge on that ground (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bacchus, 183 AD2d 720; People v McDonald, 144 AD2d 701). Goldstein, J. P., McGinity, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 350, 725 N.Y.S.2d 886, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-paulino-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack