People v. Paulino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Paulino

162 A.D.2d 632

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.D.2d 632 (People v. Paulino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Paulino, 162 A.D.2d 632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.), rendered April 9, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We note that the defendant waived his right to seek appellate review of the issues raised by that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him-to law enforcement officials, by pleading guilty while that branch of the motion was still pending and undecided (see, People v Corti, 88 AD2d 345, 347; CPL 710.70 [2]; cf., People v Allman, 133 AD2d 638).

The sentence imposed was less than that promised at the negotiated plea bargain, and we find no basis to disturb it (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Brown, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.), rendered April 9, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We note that the defendant waived his right to seek appellate review of the issues raised by that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him-to law enforcement officials, by pleading guilty while that branch of the motion was still pending and undecided (see, People v Corti, 88 AD2d 345, 347; CPL 710.70 [2]; cf., People v Allman, 133 AD2d 638).

The sentence imposed was less than that promised at the negotiated plea bargain, and we find no basis to disturb it (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Brown, J. P., Rubin, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 A.D.2d 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-paulino-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack