People v. Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Paul

134 A.D.3d 640, 21 N.Y.S.3d 616

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 2015·No. 3318/12 -3316/12 -3315/12 16491 3314/12 16490 16489 16488·Published

Opinion

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Kahn, J.), rendered on or about December 19, 2012, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed. Concur— Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Andrias and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from judgments of the Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Kahn, J.), rendered on or about December 19, 2012, said appeals having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgments so appealed from be and the same are hereby affirmed. Concur— Friedman, J.P., Acosta, Andrias and Richter, JJ.

People v. Paul, 134 A.D.3d 640, 21 N.Y.S.3d 616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

134 A.D.3d 640 (People v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.