People v. Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Paul

298 A.D.2d 854, 747 N.Y.S.2d 821, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9106

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 298 A.D.2d 854 (People v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Paul, 298 A.D.2d 854, 747 N.Y.S.2d 821, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga County Court (Fahey, J.), entered May 15, 2001, convicting defendant after a jury trial of, inter alia, murder in the second degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by directing that the sentence imposed under the count of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree shall run concurrently with the sentences imposed for robbery in the first degree under counts 10 through 13 of the indictment, as renumbered by County Court, and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Same Memorandum as in People v Paul (Tajuan) (298 AD2d 849). Present — Green, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of Onondaga County Court (Fahey, J.), entered May 15, 2001, convicting defendant after a jury trial of, inter alia, murder in the second degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by directing that the sentence imposed under the count of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree shall run concurrently with the sentences imposed for robbery in the first degree under counts 10 through 13 of the indictment, as renumbered by County Court, and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Same Memorandum as in People v Paul (Tajuan) (298 AD2d 849). Present — Green, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Burns and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 A.D.2d 854, 747 N.Y.S.2d 821, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-paul-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack