People v. Paul

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Paul

592 N.E.2d 795, 79 N.Y.2d 970, 583 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 949

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 2, 1992·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for consideration of the facts and issues raised but not passed upon on the appeal to that court. Defendant expressly consented, in the presence of counsel, to waiver of the CPL 310.10 jury sequestration requirement (People v Webb, 78 NY2d 335).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Hancock, Jr., Titone and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judges Simons and Alexander.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for consideration of the facts and issues raised but not passed upon on the appeal to that court. Defendant expressly consented, in the presence of counsel, to waiver of the CPL 310.10 jury sequestration requirement (People v Webb, 78 NY2d 335).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Hancock, Jr., Titone and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judges Simons and Alexander.

People v. Paul, 592 N.E.2d 795, 79 N.Y.2d 970, 583 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 949 (N.Y. 1992).

Pincite

592 N.E.2d 795 (People v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related