People v. Patton

131 A.D.2d 706, 516 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48166
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Patton. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 A.D.2d 836

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered July 2, 1984, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The People’s evidence at trial was legally sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt of attempted burglary in the second degree (see, People v Coe, 99 AD2d 516), and, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Furthermore, the Trial Judge’s explanation of circumstantial evidence in no way diverted the jury from the issue presented to them (see, People v Love, 92 AD2d 551, 553). The remaining alleged errors of law in the charge and in the prosecutor’s summation were not objected to at trial and, accordingly, have not been preserved for our review, and we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Weinstein, J. P., Rubin, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Patton, 131 A.D.2d 706, 516 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

131 A.D.2d 706 (People v. Patton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Love
92 A.D.2d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Coe
99 A.D.2d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)