People v. Pattison
This text of 97 A.D.2d 852 (People v. Pattison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), rendered July 17, 1980, as amended .September 14, 1981, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment, as amended, affirmed. Defendant’s guilt was established by overwhelming proof and we decline to review, in the interest of justice, the unpreserved issues concerning a purported agency defense and the necessity for corroboration of alleged accomplice testimony. Further, it was not improper to admit certain background evidence, which was essential to an understanding of the delivery to, and possession by the defendant on October 3,1977 of the [853]*853contraband in issue (see People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350, 359-360; People v Jackson, 39 NY2d 64). Finally, the replacement of a sitting juror with an alternate after it appeared that the sitting juror knew a witness in the case, was within the court’s discretion and did not prejudice defendant (CPL 270.35; see Smith v Phillips, 455 US 209; People v West, 92 AD2d 620, 621; cf. People v Blyden, 55 NY2d 73, 78; People v Meyer, 78 AD2d 662, 664). Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 A.D.2d 852, 469 N.Y.S.2d 20, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pattison-nyappdiv-1983.