People v. Patterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Patterson

290 A.D.2d 568, 736 N.Y.S.2d 616, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 741

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 290 A.D.2d 568 (People v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Patterson, 290 A.D.2d 568, 736 N.Y.S.2d 616, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered March 24, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to move to vacate his plea (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Passero, 222 AD2d 858). In any event, the defendant’s contention is without merit (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v McCann, 289 AD2d 703; People v Rowe, 284 AD2d 796; People v Otero, 199 AD2d 342). Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered March 24, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to move to vacate his plea (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Passero, 222 AD2d 858). In any event, the defendant’s contention is without merit (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v McCann, 289 AD2d 703; People v Rowe, 284 AD2d 796; People v Otero, 199 AD2d 342). Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann and Prudenti, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 568, 736 N.Y.S.2d 616, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-patterson-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack