People v. Patterson

265 A.D.2d 843, 696 N.Y.S.2d 720, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9911
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Patterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 A.D.2d 384

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11). That waiver encompasses defendant’s contention concerning the severity of the sentence (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). We reject the contention of defendant that the sentencing court erred in denying his pro se motion for substitution of assigned counsel (see, People v Murray, 245 AD2d 531, 532, lv denied 91 NY2d 943). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Burns, J. — Burglary, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurl-butt, Scudder and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Patterson, 265 A.D.2d 843, 696 N.Y.S.2d 720, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

265 A.D.2d 843 (People v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Murray
245 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)