People v. Patterson

265 A.D.2d 843, 696 N.Y.S.2d 720, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9911

This text of 265 A.D.2d 843 (People v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Patterson, 265 A.D.2d 843, 696 N.Y.S.2d 720, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11). That waiver encompasses defendant’s contention concerning the severity of the sentence (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). We reject the contention of defendant that the sentencing court erred in denying his pro se motion for substitution of assigned counsel (see, People v Murray, 245 AD2d 531, 532, lv denied 91 NY2d 943). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Burns, J. — Burglary, 1st Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Wisner, Hurl-butt, Scudder and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Murray
245 A.D.2d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D.2d 843, 696 N.Y.S.2d 720, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-patterson-nyappdiv-1999.