People v. Patric T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Patric T.

137 A.D.3d 659, 26 N.Y.S.3d 863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 24, 2016

Docket620 292/12

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 137 A.D.3d 659 (People v. Patric T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Patric T., 137 A.D.3d 659, 26 N.Y.S.3d 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ann M. Donnelly, J., at plea; Ralph A. Fabrizio, J., at sentencing), rendered June 20, 2013, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3V2 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of adjudicating defendant a youthful offender and reducing the sentence to a term of five years’ probation, and otherwise affirmed.

We find that the circumstances cited by defendant render him an eligible youth (see CPL 720.10 [3] [i]), and we find the sentence, including the denial of youthful offender treatment, excessive to the extent indicated. In light of this determination, we find it unnecessary to reach any other issues.

Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ann M. Donnelly, J., at plea; Ralph A. Fabrizio, J., at sentencing), rendered June 20, 2013, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3V2 years, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of adjudicating defendant a youthful offender and reducing the sentence to a term of five years’ probation, and otherwise affirmed.

We find that the circumstances cited by defendant render him an eligible youth (see CPL 720.10 [3] [i]), and we find the sentence, including the denial of youthful offender treatment, excessive to the extent indicated. In light of this determination, we find it unnecessary to reach any other issues.

Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Manzanet-Daniels, Kapnick and Webber, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 A.D.3d 659, 26 N.Y.S.3d 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-patric-t-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack