Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Paternoster

People v. Paternoster

140 A.D.2d 995, 529 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6246
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 27, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 A.D.2d 995 (People v. Paternoster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Paternoster, 140 A.D.2d 995, 529 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Memorandum: The evidence was sufficient to show that when defendant unlawfully entered the buildings he intended to commit the crime of larceny therein.

The prosecutor’s delay in providing defendant with the statements made by the witness did not constitute reversible [996]*996error because no prejudice to the defense accrued thereby (see, People v Ranghelle, 69 NY2d 56). (Appeal from judgment of Oneida County Court, Murad, J. — burglary, second degree, and other charges.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Violante
144 A.D.2d 995 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.2d 995, 529 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-paternoster-nyappdiv-1988.