People v. Patacchiola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Patacchiola

290 A.D.2d 568, 736 N.Y.S.2d 616, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 800

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 290 A.D.2d 568 (People v. Patacchiola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Patacchiola, 290 A.D.2d 568, 736 N.Y.S.2d 616, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Phillips, J.), revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Berry, J.), upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, the sentence being an indeterminate term of 1 to 3 years’ imprisonment upon his previous conviction of driving while intoxicated as a felony.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic.

The defendant completed the service of his amended sentence (see, People v Griffin, 239 AD2d 936; People v Coleman, 179 AD2d 670). Therefore, the appeal must be dismissed as academic. Ritter, Acting P.J., O’Brien, Goldstein, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the County Court, Orange County (Phillips, J.), revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Berry, J.), upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, the sentence being an indeterminate term of 1 to 3 years’ imprisonment upon his previous conviction of driving while intoxicated as a felony.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic.

The defendant completed the service of his amended sentence (see, People v Griffin, 239 AD2d 936; People v Coleman, 179 AD2d 670). Therefore, the appeal must be dismissed as academic. Ritter, Acting P.J., O’Brien, Goldstein, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 568, 736 N.Y.S.2d 616, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-patacchiola-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack