People v. Passino

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Passino

904 N.E.2d 837, 12 N.Y.3d 748

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 24, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 904 N.E.2d 837 (People v. Passino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Passino, 904 N.E.2d 837, 12 N.Y.3d 748 (N.Y. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. The issues raised on appeal were not preserved for this Court’s review. Defendant did not raise any issue under Miranda v Arizona (384 US 436 [1966]) at County Court, and that court’s ruling on the Miranda issue did not address any of the arguments defendant now makes.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. The issues raised on appeal were not preserved for this Court’s review. Defendant did not raise any issue under Miranda v Arizona (384 US 436 [1966]) at County Court, and that court’s ruling on the Miranda issue did not address any of the arguments defendant now makes.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

904 N.E.2d 837, 12 N.Y.3d 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-passino-ny-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack