People v. Passino

904 N.E.2d 837, 12 N.Y.3d 748
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 24, 2009·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. The issues raised on appeal were not preserved for this Court’s review. Defendant did not raise any issue under Miranda v Arizona (384 US 436 [1966]) at County Court, and that court’s ruling on the Miranda issue did not address any of the arguments defendant now makes.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Passino, 904 N.E.2d 837, 12 N.Y.3d 748 (N.Y. 2009).

904 N.E.2d 837 (People v. Passino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Perkins
2020 NY Slip Op 3425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Darrell
145 A.D.3d 1316 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Jackson
141 A.D.3d 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Hadfield
119 A.D.3d 1224 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)