People v. Passero

124 A.D.2d 859

This text of 124 A.D.2d 859 (People v. Passero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Passero, 124 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

Memorandum: Although a delay of over 18 months occurred between defendant’s arrest and his plea of guilty to the felony charge of driving while intoxicated and related offenses, under the circumstances presented here he was not deprived of his constitutional right to be brought swiftly to trial. Defendant sought or consented to a part of the delay, most of which was attributable to court congestion which "tends to 'weigh less heavily’ on the State when a court evaluates constitutional speedy trial claims” (People v Watts, 57 NY2d 299, 303). Defendant was not incarcerated while awaiting trial and there is no indication in the record that he had been prejudiced by the delay or that the likelihood of his acquittal was affected thereby. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — driving while intoxicated, and other offenses.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Watts
442 N.E.2d 1188 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A.D.2d 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-passero-nyappdiv-1986.