People v. Parulski

277 A.D.2d 909, 715 N.Y.S.2d 679
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Parulski. Read the opinion of the Court — 277 A.D.2d 907
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 2000·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

—Order reversed on the law, application denied, indictment reinstated and matter remitted to Steuben County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Same Memorandum as in People v Parulski (277 AD2d 907 [decided herewith]).

All concur except Green, J. P., and Wisner, J., who dissent and vote to affirm in the same dissenting Memorandum as in People v Parulski (277 AD2d 907,908 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Steuben County Court, Bradstreet, J. — Dismiss Indictment.) Present — Green, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Parulski, 277 A.D.2d 909, 715 N.Y.S.2d 679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

277 A.D.2d 909 (People v. Parulski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Parulski
277 A.D.2d 907 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)